Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 06:34:49 06/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 1999 at 04:32:04, blass uri wrote: > >On June 05, 1999 at 02:19:42, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On June 05, 1999 at 01:59:54, Tania Devora wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>A poor result for fritz5.32. why ? >> >>I assume you played it on one computer. I do not know enough about Fritz and >>Hiarcs if you play them on one computer maybe one will be worse off. >> >>I know CM6K loves to eat all CPU power, so there would be a disadvantage there. > >The difference is that Hiarcs7.32 is an engine for Fritz(both program are sold >by chessbase so chessbase should care that in engine-engine games it will not >happen. > >I do not know about the case of Hiarcs7.32 but from my experience from >engine-engine matches[Junior against crafty or Fritz5(16 bit)] there is no >problem of eating CPU. > >It is possible that the fact that the sides could not use the permanent brain >gave advantage fo Hiarcs7.32 because hiarcs7.32 does not clear the hash tables >after every move and the fact that it remember information from previous search >may be more significant without permanent brain. > >It is also possible that the Hiarcs7.32 was lucky. > >In computer games sometimes there are results of 8:2 between equal opponents >because one player was unlucky to choose openings that it does not understand. > >Uri Another thing is that Fritz needs big hashtables to perform better. Since it seems to have a bad hashing strategy, anything less than 64M isn't good for it. I don't think Hiarcs has the same problem. Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.