Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin
Date: 07:57:35 06/05/99
Go up one level in this thread
I agree. I am also surprised this has 'blown up' the way it has. I know that part of the reason is that when I'm asked in the responce post why I said something, or what this has to do with computer chess, I (reasonably), answer, so the thread continues. (As here). Perhaps the moderator's could (should they?),step in here & delete this whole thread now. mrslug - the chess software addict! On June 05, 1999 at 02:46:19, Micheal Cummings wrote: >You know this is all getting a bit silly. Simply put, no matter how you spell >his name. In the recent posts I think we all know who they are talking about. If >in a months time he is mentioned again and his name is spelt wrong, and if >people have no idea about him, then you can ask do you mean GM Rohde. > >Otherwise I think it is time to drop off this thread and get on with life. No >one is writing it the wrong way to offend him. I wrote his name Rhode, Simply >because when I was writing my post the server was slow, I did not have another >reference to his name and I was not going to backstep and waste time. So I spelt >it the way I thought it was spelt. > >Time to get over it, no one was offending him. And if they constantly kep >writing it wrong, send them an email. it is nothing we have to write a whole >thread about. > >Maybe What does this have to do with computer chess is a title and post that in >its name itself is going to cause conflict. I think instead of making blunt >statements intending to insight conflict, we should just write what I did, the >reason for writing it wrong and get on with life.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.