Author: Will Singleton
Date: 08:53:04 06/07/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 1999 at 09:29:02, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On June 07, 1999 at 06:23:12, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 07, 1999 at 05:00:49, Prakash Das wrote: >> >>>>I will make big efforts to no longer allow anonymous e-mail accounts here for a >>>>new period. Also for existing accounts via hotmail etc. >>>> >>>>Only exception: if someone with this account wants to stay, he has to prove his >>>>identity. >>> >>> I don't like to get involved in these moderator discussions as I believe they >>>are mostly futile. But Harald, I think, this time you are going too far. >>>I voted for you last time, because I like your succint approach to moderating. >>> >>> Free email accounts are a new internet phenomenon that is only going to grow >>>as time goes by.. Internet companies like this idea to make advertising money. >>>Are you really planning to cut off hundreds of good folks? No matter what >>>positive benefit you may have in mind, punishing at least even one innocent >>>person is not worth this. >>> >>> Hope you will reconsider your position (i was about to vote for you again, but >>>now.. I don't know). >> >>Just imagine there is reason for it. >>What do you think why Will seconds to this point? 2 of 3 moderators of the last >>period want that. > >Well if free email is the root of all evil in CCC, then go for it. You mentioned >in another reply, that the ones speaking the loudest have the most to hide. > >Well I had a hotmail, now I have a free Australian email account. I do not have >one with my ISP, extra charge so I told them to go jump. I do not drive, so no >drivers license. As for other ID whats that, No passport. I will be damned if I >will send credit card details over the net, and certainly not for this. As for >scanning other private documents, well I think not. > >I pretty much expect that I would leave if this was bought in, and over the past >couple of day we have talked about certain events between us through email >Harold. And I would take it that maybe you find this an easy way to get rid of >me and others on here you for some reason have something against. > >Well go ahead, I can do without posting on here. I give my real name, and if >that is not good enough for people then I cannot be bothered to give anymore >than that. Certainly not for posting in here. It was not part of the original >deal when I signed up. > >I think people have agendas in here, and we all know we can write and twist >words to get a point accross. So if you want me out of here Harold for making a >post which was a joke and typically harmless, then fine. If you or Will are >voted back in as moderators then I am out of here. > >Apart from being a great Chessmaster Fan, I would like to know from anyone in >here what I have done to warrant Harold basically telling me that I am no longer >welcome in here. Whats the point he will delete this post anyway. > >My hypothetical about moderators having agendas against certain people, well it >was no hypothetical. But loved Harolds reply anyway > >seeya mc, The only reason your account wasn't removed a long time ago is because of Harald. I asked for agreement on this at least twice. Your post is an uninteresting mix of misinformation, trolling, and nonsense. A good example of what is wrong with CCC. Complete waste of time. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.