Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Will next version of Junior have underpromotion code?

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 06:19:33 06/08/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 08, 1999 at 03:30:37, blass uri wrote:

>
>On June 08, 1999 at 00:47:02, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On June 07, 1999 at 21:22:45, Mike CastaƱuela wrote:
>>
>>>On June 07, 1999 at 19:08:42, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On June 07, 1999 at 16:41:56, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 07, 1999 at 16:35:24, blass uri wrote:
>>>>>[snip]
>>>>>>In part of these 7% of the cases(including your 3 examples) underpromotion is
>>>>>>needed only to win faster but is not important practically for the result of the
>>>>>>game.
>>>>>The same would be true of a program that takes a bishop to go up +3 instead of
>>>>>taking a rook to go up +5.  Which program would you rather have?
>>>>
>>>>The one that knows how to get to the position where it can win either way.
>>>>
>>>>Dave
>>>
>>>But if one way (that can be unique to the victory path)
>>>of those all ways is not feasible, then what?
>>>Too, underpromotions weigh in esthetic terms, not only practical.
>>
>>If?  Well, then you miss the win.  Tough one.  But how realistic is this "if"?
>>Not very.  However, if accounting for underpromotions would slow down Junior by
>>a few percent in every game it plays, that's not an "if", that's a definite
>>relative penalty, in every single game.
>>
>>It's a chess engine.  Aesthetics are for user interfaces, not engines. ;-)
>>
>>Dave
>
>I think that there is no reason to slow Junior down by a few percent to consider
>underpromotion.
>
>You can use 0.1% of your time to compare between search with underpromotion and
>without underpromotion and if there is a difference then to use an evaluation
>function that allow underpromotions.
>
>In this case you lose less than 0.1% of your time and I believe that you play
>slightly better.
>
>Uri

You need to identify the need for underpromotion while the actual underpromotion
is out at the leaf nodes.  Otherwise you will choose a different variation and
not require it.  Checking for it only at the root isn't terribly useful in the
context of playing a game.

Dave



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.