Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba
Date: 08:50:24 06/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 1999 at 09:49:53, Howard Exner wrote: >On June 07, 1999 at 13:13:11, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On June 07, 1999 at 12:36:07, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>I guess I'm just tired of replying to those who post games >>>when numerous follw-ups by other posters include: >>> >>>What machine was that? >>>Were you using two or one computer? >>>What's the MHz of the computer? >>>Hash size? >>>What was that time control again? >>> >>>I suppose I'll lobby on this for awhile on this site. >>>Some might think it worthwhile to have this info >>>included in the PGN score and then start including it. >>> >>>The SSDF guys have it right. Maybe we can call it the >>>"SSDF protocol for computer PGN games"? >> >>Well, time control can be included easily and should be included. ICC includes >>it in the title, which is wrong but it works. >> >>Yes, if you post a game it makes sense to include all of that other information, >>but it doesn't make much sense to add tags to PGN, in my opinion. > >I agree with this also. I'd like to see the info included within >the extablished parameters of PGN. The "Event" tag could be used >for stuff like one vs two computers while the "White" and Black" >identifiers of programs should also include the machine, speed and hash size. > >> >>If all else fails you can include a comment in curly braces before the first >>move, which describes exactly what you did. >> >>bruce > >Who invented the PGN standard? Steven J. Edwards did.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.