Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Will next version of Junior have underpromotion code?

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 09:40:21 06/08/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 07, 1999 at 19:26:13, Marc Plum wrote:

>On June 07, 1999 at 06:32:39, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>(snip)
>>How often did you have a position where underpromotion was best move?
>>
>>I don't miss this "feature".
>
>Seems to me that this misses the point.
>
>Underpromotions are part of the game of chess, although admittedly a fairly
>minor one.  I don't like a programmer rewriting the rules of the game for his
>own convenience, even if, hypothetically, his program will be more successful as
>a result.
>
>I have all due respect for Messrs. Ban and Bushinsky, who have written a first
>rate program.  Junior can accept a few (very few) unnecessary draws and losses
>as the result of its blind spot, and still be a top performer.
>
>I prefer it when the programmer accepts the game as it is, and tries to make his
>brainchild play as well as possible within that framework.
>
>Marc Plum
>
>P.S.
>
>Interesting article on Bishop and Rook underpromotions at
>http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess2/minor.htm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.