Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 20:35:33 06/08/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 08, 1999 at 18:33:05, KarinsDad wrote: >On June 08, 1999 at 18:26:19, Jay Rinde wrote: > >>On June 08, 1999 at 18:10:24, Steven Schwartz wrote: >> >>>More probing questions... >>> >>> 1) Do you think that members who have lost their CCC privileges should >>>be allowed back in now that new moderators will take over? If so, under >>>what circumstances? >>> >>> 2) How many of the 3 moderators must agree before a member loses his >>>CCC privileges? >>> >>> 3) How many of the 3 moderators must agree that a post gets deleted? >>> >>>- Steve (ICD/Your Move) >> >>If a post is to be deleted, it must first be read! Unless it is a large thread >>that is deemed unfit. If a post is deleted the poster should at least have the >>right to protest to one of the other moderators and given a reasonable answer to >>why it was deleted. My post that was deleted insulted no one or no thing. It is >>not a big deal. But if I take the time to post an innocent comment about opening >>books and it is deleted as unfit, I feel I have been treated unfairly. And I >>was. There should have been some way to have a third party look at the post and >>tell me what I did wrong! > >How do you propose to set up this third party process? > >My recommendation is to Email to Steve and the moderators asking for more >details on why a message was deleted and also asking that it be re-posted if it >was not offensive. Let the 4 of them make the call. Is this fair? > >KarinsDad :) In all post deletion cases, enough information should be provided to a poster by a moderator that there is no doubt as to why it was deleted. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.