Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 05:23:56 06/09/99
I am sure with all the brains that frequent this place, that a group or anyone could come up with a detailed set of regulations, Detailing 1. What is acceptable and what is not in posting in finer detail 2. How to handle member problems with moderation issues, maybe someone who could give a final result on on a dispute between moderators and members arguments. 3. Details on penalties given for certain actions. There would be many other things that I am sure people could find. * We still have up in the air, accusing non members or people of cheating with only their opinion as proof. * What should be tolerated in non computer posts. I am sure people could write down their ideas, and someone like Fernando could put it together for steve to have final approval. and that way it could be fine tuned over the next 2 months or so. and we can have a very details document saying what will happen when members are bad, and what is acceptable or not. And covering all issues Instead of every time new moderators coming in, and what the previous moderators found acceptable, could lead to being banned for the same with the new moderators. This is unacceptable and members should be made clear as to what is required in posting and topics. Moderators need to moderate on a set of know rules, not make them up as they go along. As we can see now, some nominees are more tolerant than others, to confusing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.