Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Little Goliath Gold - reliable results?

Author: CLiebert

Date: 00:39:18 06/10/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 09, 1999 at 12:31:27, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote:

>On June 09, 1999 at 07:46:34, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>>
>>>On principle your are right. To my experience after 100 games
>>>against 4 or 5 opponents your have first nice trend. Not more.
>>>200 games would be much better and everthing over 300
>>>seems to be more stabil and reliable, I agree.
>>
>>But I think, if You use Nunn or SEE test You see trend much faster, 300
>>games not needed. BTW in my PC LGG2.05 is not running with full speed under
>>Fritz5.32 - You need Winboard.
>>
>>Jouni
>
>	I think that the Nunn test is interesting and provides useful information, but
>it does not measure playing strength. To measure playing strength test games
>from the initial position and using the recommended settings are required.
>	What is the SEE test?
>José.

The See-Test is on principle the same as the nunn-test only using
other, less deep positions. 16 instead of 10 (32 games).

Christian



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.