Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Natural Analogs of Chess

Author: Charles L. Williams

Date: 15:12:03 06/10/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 10, 1999 at 10:32:25, Ricardo Gibert wrote:

>On June 10, 1999 at 09:53:13, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote:
>
>>As I sit watching the dust particles randomly move along a shaft of light
>>entering my bedroom I make the association with chess.  Particles moving close
>>to me represent the opening and those further away the mid game and end game.
>>The fan above my head rotates at a set speed but moves the pieces of dust in a
>>random manner.
>>
>>Is computer chess a random process?  Can we solve a chaotic entity?  Clouds form
>>over my head in a random but semi-predictable fashion.  A bumblebee chooses
>>which flower to land on at random as I choose which flowers to smell at random
>>(the ones with no bees on them).  Grapevines branch at random as do their leaf
>>veins but we know it is a grapevine.
>>
>>We choose chess openings at random or according to our fancies or fantasies.  As
>>the rain falling from the sky so it is with the chessmen.  From 32 pieces down
>>to two equal but opposite pieces like night and day--that is the perfect game of
>>chess.
>>
>>Tim Frohlick, Natural Philosopher and chess player
>
>I'm afraid you have too much time in your hands.

Nobody has too much time on their hands, and this seems like time well spent.

Chuck



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.