Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 11:19:58 06/11/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 1999 at 12:44:25, blass uri wrote: > >On June 11, 1999 at 10:22:36, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > ><snipped> >>Hello Uri, >> >>Yes, I had it set for 40/2. I repeated this test more than once at 40/2- and >>every time Fritz played b4. > >It is possible that Fritz expected 17...Ng6 after playing the 17th move. >Hiarcs7.32 used 511 seconds to play 17...Ng6 and Fritz at the same time used >the permanent brain for 511 seconds so it had more time to consider move 18 > >If you want to know if Fritz could find move 18 at tournament time control then >I think that you should give it to calculate move 17 and after it play 17.f4 to >wait 511 seconds and only then to play 17...Ng6 and to see what is the move of >Fritz because in the game Fritz waited 511 seconds for the move of Hiarcs7.32. Hello Uri, I will try your suggestion above; meanwhile, I believe you stated something to the effect that Hiarcs wasn't using Naimov Tablebases. Hiarcs needs 8 GB available on the hard drive to copy the tablebase info., otherwise, Hiarcs is not using the Naimov Tablebase at all. Regards, Mel > ><snipped> >>They should not be using the same book > >I think that tania is using the same opening twice(one time for white and one >time for black. > >Regards, >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.