Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 06:13:56 06/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 1999 at 02:09:45, Brett Clark wrote: >Tania, don't be amazed that Fritz is losing. First of all, you are playing >engine vs. engine on one machine, which doesn't allow a program to think on >its opponent's time. More importantly, at higher processor speeds, Fritz needs >about twice as much RAM for hash tables as Hiarcs. The true test will be when >many matches are autoplayed on separate, equally configured machines. Hello Brett, You said it very well indeed! Yes, I too have posted the fact that Fritz needs more Hash-table megs than what Tania allows. Unfortunately, that is the only way for her to do the test. However, the strong criticism I see in regards to Fritz's play does somewhat bother me for I like to see two programs tested equally - as you have stated above. I have both Fritz and Hiarcs and I don't have any bias towards either - just want to see fair testing giving meaningful results. Regards, Mel > >June 12, 1999 at 00:27:49, Tania Devora wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>Hi guys, this is the number 12 game under tournament controls. I am AMAZED, >>Fritz5.32 has lost again !! >> >>I think that the openning was very good for both, there wasn't any advantage for >>both programs, look the game. I think that the position was a clear draw after >>Queen Exchange in the move 31. Qxc5, What do you think ???? >> >> >>Later Fritz5.32 was a fighting for a draw but it was to late, the move 51.Nxf4? >>finish him totally. The rest of the game was too easy for Hiarcs7.32 that is >>clearly showing that he is the best. >> >>Finally I dont understand how Fritz could lose this game, as he has lost another >>draw game, number nine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.