Author: Brian Smith
Date: 07:36:57 06/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 1999 at 06:42:12, Lin Harper wrote: > It seems to be positionally bad, small book etc. But somehow > how it wins with monotonous regularity. It's got to have > something going for it. Positionally bad? I'm of course not the best person to judge this, but my impresstion was the opposite of that. I know it doesn't perform very well on the LCTII in positional play, but I think most of the positional positions could be solved with brute force tactics anyway... what do you guys base your opinion on?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.