Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 13:02:53 06/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 1999 at 11:17:59, blass uri wrote: > >On June 12, 1999 at 09:01:50, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>On June 12, 1999 at 06:08:06, blass uri wrote: >> >>> >>>On June 12, 1999 at 00:27:49, Tania Devora wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Hi guys, this is the number 12 game under tournament controls. I am AMAZED, >>>>Fritz5.32 has lost again !! >>> >>>I am not surprised because Hiarcs7.32 is better than >>Fritz5.32 >> >>After just 10 games? Tania does not give Fritz the ampount of Hash-tables he >>needs. This deficiency of HT could and probably is affecting his play. According >>to published data and my conversatons with ChessBase, Fritz depends a lot on HT, >>and his playing will be affected by a drastic reducton of what is recommended by >>the formula in Fritz's manual. > >Hiarcs7.32 is also affected by the fact that it cannot use >the nalimov tablebases because tania has not enough memory in the harddisk. >It is possible that it drew some games that it could win with nalimov tablbases. > >I know that mark young believes that Hiarcs7 is better than Fritz5.32 >and Hiarcs7.32 is probably 25% faster than Hiarcs7. Hello Uri, For what it's worth, the SSDF testing between Hiarcs 7 and Fritz 5.32 in 40 games is Fritz 22 - Hiarcs 18. > > >>>Hiarcs needs to play against better opponents. >> >>Did you say better opponents than the #1 rated program by the SSDF? What is >>better than Fritz? CM6000? > >I hope that Junior5.4 is better >It is not commercial >The comercial version of Junior is Junior5 Unfortnately we can only speculate here because the 5.4 is not available to test against either Hiarcs or Fritz. > >I also have problem to trust the 28.5:11.5 of Hiarcs7 against Junior5 in the >ssdf games when all the other tests of public games showed better results for >Junior5. >Hiarcs7.32(better than Hiarcs7) won against Junior5 in the games that were >posted here only 11.5:8.5(the sides did not use the original opening book and it >was something similiar to the nunn test) > >I also found that some programs on pentium90 performed better than 11.5:28.5 >against Hiarcs7(pentium200). > >These games are not public so I cannot check if there is no mistake. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.