Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 07:12:56 06/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 12, 1999 at 16:38:34, blass uri wrote: > >On June 12, 1999 at 16:02:53, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > ><snipped> >>>I know that mark young believes that Hiarcs7 is better than Fritz5.32 >>>and Hiarcs7.32 is probably 25% faster than Hiarcs7. >> >>Hello Uri, >> >>For what it's worth, the SSDF testing between Hiarcs 7 and Fritz 5.32 in 40 >>games is Fritz 22 - Hiarcs 18. > >I know about this result. >In this case the games are public >This match was very close and Fritz5.32 won the last 3 games but hiarcs7.32 is >faster then Hiarcs7. > >I know that mark young believes that Hiarcs earns more from faster hardware. >He believes that Fritz5.32 is too aggresive and it can be a problem at long time >control. > ><snipped> >>Unfortnately we can only speculate here because the 5.4 is not available to test >>against either Hiarcs or Fritz. > >It is available to me and I think to test it against Hiarcs7.32 Why not test it against Fritz 5.32 as well? I am not a Fritz 5.32 fanatic. I have both Fritz 5.32 and Hiarcs 7.32. It's just that I like to see meaningful testing of top programs with equal parameters for all.I should emphasize as equal as possible! Mel l> >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.