Author: Tomas Casanovas Martinez
Date: 15:48:32 06/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 1999 at 17:48:50, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >On June 13, 1999 at 16:23:17, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: > >>I have been operating three computers simultaneusly -overnight- to test H.7.32 >>against the following programs: Fritz 5.32, Junior 5 and Crafty 16.6. All the >>games at tournement level: 40 moves 2 hours. Unfortunately my computers are >>different: > >What is the opening book you are using for Fritz? General ctg or F5 ctg? And >what is the Hash-table info for Fritz and Hiarcs? And only 5 games? > >Mel >> >>Pentium II 400 , 256 hash, 'Hiarcs 7.32 environment', against Fritz 5.32 >>Hiarcs 7.32 - Fritz 5.32 +2 -0 =3 3,5-1,5 >> >>Pentium 200, 64 hash, 'Junior 5 environment', against Junior 5. >>Hiarcs 7.32 - Junior 5 +4 -3 =1 4,5-3,5 >> >>Pentium 90, 32 hash, 'Fritz 5.32 environment', against Crafty 16.6. >>Hiarcs 7.32 - Crafty 16.6 +4 -3 =0 4,0-3,0 >> >>Although I know well that at least 200 games are necessary to establish tha >>rating of a new program, my feeling is that this extremely strong Hiarcs 7.32 >>will be rated around 2625, well above all the other commercial programmes. >> >>It is a bit surprising that whereas H 7.32 consistently wins against Fritz 5.32 >>in all the tests performed -Tania, et al.-, it has substantial problems to win >>against Junior 5 and Crafty 16.6, who have proven to be extremely strong rivals. >> >>Do you think that the different hardware and 'environments' have been decisive >>for the results obtained?. My computers are still working on... >> >>Tomas. Mel, I use Hiarcs.ctg both for Hiarcs and for Fritz. Tomas.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.