Author: pete
Date: 12:33:28 06/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1999 at 02:28:52, blass uri wrote: > >On June 13, 1999 at 19:46:08, pete wrote: > >>nope ; you exactly found out the main problem , I have discovered the same . >> >>hiarcs 7.32 is probably the best commercial prog I know to beat fritz 5.32 ; >>period. >> >>But in fact that doesn't say much about the overall strength of the prog. >> >>I did similar tests ; as usual hiarcs has major problems with junior and it >>seems there are problems against crafty 16.6 too. >>> >If you are right then Hiarcs7.32 is worse than Hiarcs7. > >>And if you start a big tourney with all of them the winner will be Fritz 5.32 >>again; the percentage master ;) > >I know that in a big tournament of Enrique Hiarcs7 was the winner and not >Fritz5.32 >Uri Hi Uri, I hope you will read this although it is way down due to the exciting Paderborn results as I appreciate your posts very much. As usual I wrote a short message and not a novel but I was serious. As for your refferance to Enrique's Tourney: Also there Junior defeated Hiarcs; if I remember it right it was something like 6-4. I _love_ Hiarcs 7.32 and H701 ; for me it is the greatest prog around. But as stenghth of major progs is very close every prog has its favourites and it's "bad " opponents. When I was talking about "letting them all in " I was referring to the fritz tournaments where fritz always wins ( at least at my place ) because of its outstanding performance against the weaker engines. And Hiarcs _does_ have problems with Junior in every published match I have seen depite the SSCF results. By the way : the real _bad_ opponent for Hiarcs is Shredder , a prog Fritz will spank almost always. See a funny example from this afternoon. White: Hiarcs 7.32 PII 300 128 MB RAM Black: Shredder 3.0 P 233 MMX 32 MB RAM 90min/game 1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. d4 cd 5. Nxd4 e6 6. Bf4 d5 7. a3 Bc5 8. Nxc6 bc 9. e3 0-0 10. Bd3 d4 11. Ne4 Nxe4 12. Bxe4 de 13. fe Qh4+ 14. g3 Qe7 15. Qh5 f5 16. Bf3 a5 17. 0-0-0 Bb7 18. Bg5 Qc7 19. Rd3 e5 20. e4 Qb6 21. ef Bd4 22. Rd2 Rab8 23. Be7 Be3 24. Rhd1 Bc8 25. b4 ab 26. Bxb4 Bxf5 27. g4 Bg6 0-1 Convincing, isn't it ? :) Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.