Author: blass uri
Date: 12:55:09 06/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1999 at 12:50:57, James T. Walker wrote: >On June 13, 1999 at 09:54:19, blass uri wrote: > >> >> >>>I find your results a little curious. Since I've played over 600 games with >>>Junior5.0 using auto232 and it has never lost a game on time I'm wondering if >>>this is a problem caused by not having a book or is it something with your >>>setup? >>>Jim Walker >> >>It can lose games on times in engine-engine games(not with auto232). >>I believe that this bug was fixed in my new version. >> >>Uri > >Hello Uri, >If this is true then the results of engine-engine testing on one computer is not >worth a hill of beans. >Jim Walker From my experience it does not happen often. I did 20 games of Junior5 against Junior4.6 from positions that I decided in 2 minutes per game+15 seconds per move and Junior5 lost only one game on time on my pentium200MMX. I could reproduce this game. The problem is that Junior5.0 "feels" a duty to finish the iteration before it plays a move even if it is losing on time because of it. Junior5.4 does not "feel" the same duty. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.