Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 21:17:54 06/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 1999 at 23:38:17, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On June 14, 1999 at 20:58:44, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>On June 14, 1999 at 20:47:25, Chris Hendon wrote: >> >>>This is clearly not a valid statement because it is only one game. The setting >>>should be variously set and played through a series of games, not just one. >>>Besides hiarcs is the best blitz program in the world and any other as far as >>>that goes. When the crafty beats Hiarcs 7.32 18 out of 20, then you can say its >>>better >> >>Yes, but at least now there is strong suspision that Crafty is not *much* weaker >>than Hiarcs. >> >>Eugene > >Yes, but what is the suspicion regarding how much weaker Hiarcs is than Crafty? >:-) > >Dave Sorry, of course you are right. Let's formulate it: suspicion is that one program is not much worse (or better) than other. Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.