Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 04:43:49 06/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 1999 at 06:11:55, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >This is an edited excerpt from a conversation I heard on ICC. I was somewhat >shocked by what was said. I'm wondering what other people think about this. > >Jeremiah > Doesn't mean a thing. "some" have never sat across the table from those guys and had a chance to see what that thing can do. Those can assume anything they want, but assuming doesn't make it true.. just ignore it. :) Bob >**************************************************************************** >y[7] kibitzes: junior is doing 2x tactical, db probably does 4x > >(This was in reference to extensions - Junior apparently does x-ply of >positional search, and 2x-ply in tactical search.) > >x[7] kibitzes: no >x[7] kibitzes: deep blue has released its specs >x[7] kibitzes: it's doing way less >x[7] kibitzes: junior would crush tacdtically deep blue like a child >y[7] kibitzes: way less? typical extensions were going from 5 ply > search to 20 ply >x[7] kibitzes: it's very well known since april/march what deep blue > was doing >z[7] kibitzes: DB was getting well over 40 ply selective in most positions > ...12 ply full-width with NO forward pruning... >x[7] kibitzes: is getting this position selecitvely over 40 ply too >x[7] kibitzes: says nothing >x[7] kibitzes: junior gets over 40 ply too >x[7] kibitzes: please ignore selective depths >x[7] kibitzes: i get up to 100 ply selective >****************************************************************************
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.