Author: Andrew
Date: 16:00:57 06/15/99
Out of curiosity: How top-ranked humans perceive level/quality of games played so far? Any of games played carrying theoretical value or novelty 'useful' for humans? And what does CCC members think about it... Where would you place this event in terms of fide tournament rank? Also: which game was most 'humanlike' so far.... (or maybe some of those questions fit CCC oppinion poll after WCCC is over) In general: What is the level of separation between top computer event and 'human chess'... Somehow I find 'human chess' and 'computer chess' going slowly their own directions. But then I may be biased. trolling....:) -Andrew-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.