Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:19:23 06/15/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 1999 at 18:37:17, blass uri wrote: > >On June 15, 1999 at 18:14:21, m.d.hurd wrote: > >>On June 15, 1999 at 17:16:24, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 1999 at 16:50:17, jose hernandez wrote: >>> >>>>Round 4 - June 16 >>>> >>>>Games >>> >>>Time for some (completely unscientific :) predictions... >>> >>>>1 Hiarcs - Junior 0-1 >>>>2 Nimzo - Shredder 0-1 >>>>3 Fritz - Virtual_Chess_X 1-0 >>>>4 Rebel - P.ConNerS 1-0 >>>>5 Cilkchess - Francesca 1-0 >>>>6 Ferret - SOS 1-0 >>>>7 DarkThought - LambChop 1-0 >>>>8 MChess - Zugzwang 1-0 >>>>9 ChessTiger - Mini 1-0 >>>>10 Ikarus - Centaur I don't know enough about >>>>11 EUGEN - Patzer the remaining programs to >>>>12 Isichess - Arthur make predictions >>>>13 Now - GromitChess >>>>14 RuyLopez - Diep >>>>15 Neurologic - XXXX2 >>> >>>Dave >> >> >>Why do you assume junior will beat hiarcs ? > >Junior has better hardware and my games show that my version of Junior5.4 is >clearly better than Junior5. > >I believe that the program is not worse than Hiarcs7.32 even if we assume equal >hardware. > >Everything can happen in one game but Junior is a clear favourite in this game >inspite of the fact that it is black. I agree, Looking at the games played so far, Junior seems much improved over version 5.0 (the hardware also helps). Junior looks like it has the program and the hardware to take it all. Shredder results have been a surprise, it is also playing some good chess. I expected Hiarcs to be doing well even on one of the slower computers, Hiarcs7 tends to find the correct idea quickly in its search, and is why I think its the best blitz program. I expect a good game tomorrow, but I now think Junior will win the game, since you find junior 5.4 on a par with Hiarcs and equal hardward. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.