Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 04:29:21 06/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1999 at 07:25:19, Harald Faber wrote: >OK. >Finally: The winner of a championship is the champion. Period. He may be no.1 or >no.100 in any kind of ranking list but he is still the winner of that >championship=champion so that he deserves the 'title', reasonable and justified. >It has nothing to do if he is the best overall. He was just the best in that >special tournament. Nothing more. Nothing less. Harald this is all you had to say at the start, all I was after :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.