Author: J. Wesley Cleveland
Date: 09:43:46 06/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 1999 at 23:29:16, Dann Corbit wrote: >If you have an opening book that contains brilliant moves -- especially >positional or sacrifice based upon completion -- it is quite likely that they >will cause your program terrible harm. Having a brilliant move is of no >benefit, if your program does not know what to do with the position. Even if >the opening book suggests the next move, unless your program can see what to do >after that, having such a position could do a lot more harm than good. Being >able to utilize such a position means that you must exploit a plan that >understands the position. > >Opinions? as someone said in another message ;) >I think that somebody should "pre-analyze" chess positions. Then we could have >sound books (or at least books that computers can deal with...). We could call >it the "Chess Analysis Project." > >OK, so it sounds like a silly idea. >;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.