Author: KarinsDad
Date: 17:23:50 06/16/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1999 at 19:29:02, Dave Gomboc wrote: [snip] > >Okay, I'm not actually arguing that position assessment is chaotic or anything, >but there is a certain amount of stochasticism in it that must be recognized. >It is what allows deeper searches to improve estimates of the position. And the >way we generate static evaluations is an extremely ad hoc process. > >Dave Well, maybe for most programs. I intend for my evaluations to not only be dynamic based on the conditions of the position (not an easy thing to compare to other dynamic evaluations), but also to have learning features for the evaluation (and not ad hoc in the first place). Of course, I have many ideas here that are merely a paragraph written down in the design spec here, a comment in the code there, etc. It would be nice if I at least got the thing working at some major level, but at 4 hours every 2 weeks on average, it's still slow going. Maybe I will have a good amateur program ready for the next world championships. KarinsDad :(
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.