Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 11:07:19 06/17/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 1999 at 18:16:56, Laurence Chen wrote: >On June 16, 1999 at 15:01:57, Chris Hendon wrote: > >>Throughout all of the games and tests and everything i think that the Hiarcs is >>the best overall. What do you guys think and give me some reasons and data on >>your answers please or just tell me what you think. >> >>regards, chris >I don't think Hiarcs is the best overall program. It is loosy in closed >positions, and its endgame play is not very good either. If you take a look at >the Hiarcs-Junior WCCC game, Hiarcs played planlessly for a few moves from move >25 onwards, and allowed Junior to equalize the position easily. Hiarcs was not >able to convert his tiny advantage into something more concrete. Give such >position to GM Karpov and he could easily make a full point for White. I think >that Junior is a better engine than Hiarcs, at least it plays closed positions >better than any other Chessbase engines. Although it has the underpromotion bug, >and some tactical blindness which needs to be correct. I hope that Amir releases >a new version of Junior, and all the bugs get fixed. >Laurence What you obviously forget is that Junior is running on 3 to 4 times the computing power of Hiarcs. And nobody has showed me where og what Hiarcs did wrong, exept not winning but drawing, what you said was such a god position! And Hiarcs plays in my view at least on the same level as Junior in the endgame. But perhaps Schredder is even better than Hiarcs! Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.