Author: KarinsDad
Date: 09:23:07 06/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 1999 at 04:29:58, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 17, 1999 at 17:36:44, KarinsDad wrote: > >>You rest your case? You have no case. In the current SSDF standings, Fritz 5.32 >>has a 22-18 lead over Hirarcs 7.0 on the same system with the same size hash >>tables. To argue that Hirarcs will definitely beat Fritz is not that sure of a >>prediction. That's why they play the games. I have no clue where some people >>come up with their theories. :) >> >>KarinsDad :) > >This is no SSDF in Paderborn. They are not playing P200MMX. >So this SSDF hint is, as also the Shredder results show, senseless in this case. What are you talking about Harald? I did not say that Fritz would win (which by the way it did) due to the SSDF standings. I said that assuming that Hirarcs would win was silly (which it turned out to be). The SSDF is a fair indicator of which programs may be at the top, but OF COURSE anything can happen and OF COURSE, running on different hardware and configurations will result in different stengths. When did I say otherwise? Using the SSDF as a rough indicator as to which programs may be stronger is NOT senseless. Using the SSDF or any other information to proclaim a winner ahead of time (as some people have done) is senseless. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.