Author: Chris Carson
Date: 09:35:51 06/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 1999 at 12:23:07, KarinsDad wrote: >On June 18, 1999 at 04:29:58, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 17, 1999 at 17:36:44, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>You rest your case? You have no case. In the current SSDF standings, Fritz 5.32 >>>has a 22-18 lead over Hirarcs 7.0 on the same system with the same size hash >>>tables. To argue that Hirarcs will definitely beat Fritz is not that sure of a >>>prediction. That's why they play the games. I have no clue where some people >>>come up with their theories. :) >>> >>>KarinsDad :) >> >>This is no SSDF in Paderborn. They are not playing P200MMX. >>So this SSDF hint is, as also the Shredder results show, senseless in this case. > >What are you talking about Harald? > >I did not say that Fritz would win (which by the way it did) due to the SSDF >standings. I said that assuming that Hirarcs would win was silly (which it >turned out to be). > >The SSDF is a fair indicator of which programs may be at the top, but OF COURSE >anything can happen and OF COURSE, running on different hardware and >configurations will result in different stengths. When did I say otherwise? >Using the SSDF as a rough indicator as to which programs may be stronger is NOT >senseless. Using the SSDF or any other information to proclaim a winner ahead of >time (as some people have done) is senseless. > >KarinsDad :) Well said. Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.