Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 19:48:57 06/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 1999 at 15:05:30, Michael Ginat wrote: >On June 18, 1999 at 13:37:53, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>Is the hardware Fritz is running on so much better than what Hiarcs is using to >>suggest the difference in hardware had a signiicant reason for Fritz's victory? >> >>Mel > >I performed an Opening Survey analysis with Chessbase 7, over Knut's 1 million >plus database, and found that Hiarcs'7 move ...Nh5 had a VERY POOR score >compared to the main lines. Therefore it seems to me that not only was Hiarcs >black, it played a doubtful opening line, and to me that is more of a factor >than the hardware. >Having said that does anyone know why Hiarcs didn;t play ...Q:e4 at some stage? >I was watching the game when Hiarcs played ...Qd4 and poor Human that I am I >couldn't see why the e4 pawn was taboo...the counter attack on the f2 pawn >didn't work in any case... >Michael About Qxe4 being played earlier: There was some confusion relaying the moves. The move Rea1 (move 46??) was substituted for the actual move Raa1. This was not corrected for about another half dozen moves into the game. You must have moved on to something else by then.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.