Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 19:54:53 06/18/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 1999 at 22:48:57, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On June 18, 1999 at 15:05:30, Michael Ginat wrote: > >>On June 18, 1999 at 13:37:53, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >> >>> >>>Is the hardware Fritz is running on so much better than what Hiarcs is using to >>>suggest the difference in hardware had a signiicant reason for Fritz's victory? >>> >>>Mel >> >>I performed an Opening Survey analysis with Chessbase 7, over Knut's 1 million >>plus database, and found that Hiarcs'7 move ...Nh5 had a VERY POOR score >>compared to the main lines. Therefore it seems to me that not only was Hiarcs >>black, it played a doubtful opening line, and to me that is more of a factor >>than the hardware. >>Having said that does anyone know why Hiarcs didn;t play ...Q:e4 at some stage? >>I was watching the game when Hiarcs played ...Qd4 and poor Human that I am I >>couldn't see why the e4 pawn was taboo...the counter attack on the f2 pawn >>didn't work in any case... >>Michael > >About Qxe4 being played earlier: There was some confusion relaying the moves. >The move Rea1 (move 46??) was substituted for the actual move Raa1. This was >not corrected for about another half dozen moves into the game. You must have >moved on to something else by then. Some other thread mentions this as move 36.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.