Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 11:03:33 06/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 1999 at 00:53:42, Brian Smith wrote: >On June 18, 1999 at 13:37:53, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>Is the hardware Fritz is running on so much better than what Hiarcs is using to >>suggest the difference in hardware had a signiicant reason for Fritz's victory? >> >>Mel > >Well, it seems people will never stop trying to slam Fritz. I don't have the >program so I can't say I'm a fan. Half a year ago people said Fritz doesn't do >well at long time controls and is optimized for a P200... now that it keeps >winning with faster hardware it has an unfair advantage because of it....hmmm... What? I was merely asking a question here; I was not slammimg Fritz. If you had seen previous posts of mine, you would know I have defended Fritz against what I would call unfair testing. By the way, I don't state which program is tops - I simply do not have the answer to that one. I just like to see equal testing - as equal as possible - and that is all. The relevance of Fritz running on better hardware, if that is the case, would have some meaning in its match against Hiarcs, wouldn't you agree? Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.