Author: blass uri
Date: 12:40:12 06/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 1999 at 14:30:58, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>>having both Shredder2 and CM6K, CM6K is way ahead of shredder2 in my tests, and >>>also I would say shredder3. It a shame that unlike all the other programs taking >>>part needing to prove something to everyone. Chessmaster is happy in the >>>knowledge that is just so good that it does not need to take part in these >>>little events to prove just how good it is over the others who are taking part >>>:-) > >thats definetly not true. >maybe cm6 is better than s2 and maybe even against s3. okay, why not. but it has >no chance against this paderborn version. >in my tests on pIII-500 machine and 30m blitz, this shredder 4 gains over 65% >against cm6, 72% against H7.32, 75% against Nimzo2000 and 52% against Junior 5. >Longer time controls gives shredder further advantage. How do you know it? >this world-championship shows also clearly, that it´s very difficult to beat >him It is very difficult to beat it and not to beat him. , even if he comes out of book very badly. >it´s evident, that this is the best program in these days. You can only be sure by tests that it is better than the commercial of today but other programs also make improvements. It is possible that you are right but we need more data to be sure. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.