Author: James Robertson
Date: 14:33:49 06/19/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 1999 at 16:32:41, blass uri wrote: >Junior 4.5 out of 7 is better than cilkchess 5 out of 7 because Junior played >against better oponnents. > >Junior won cilkchess and played against >Shredder,Fritz,Darkthought,Nimzo,Hiarcs,Eugen(all of these program have at least >4.5 out of 7 except hiarcs and Eugen with 4 out of 7) > >Cilkchess was lucky to play against weak programs like patzer and sos in the >first 2 rounds and did not play against strong opponents except Junior,dark >thought and Hiarcs7. > > >The result is that the humans are going to have an easier job tommorow because >they are not going to play the best 4 computers. > >Uri Of all the people to be saying that we should make decisions without evidence of games, I would have expected you to be the last. :( We have 7 games of Cilkchess total and 10 of Deep Junior (including Gelfand games), and you have already decided that Deep Junior is better? You do not have much evidence for that. Perhaps Cilkchess really deserves to be champion and it was just bad luck it did not become champion. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.