Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 00:00:35 06/20/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 1999 at 22:10:31, eric guttenberg wrote: >And another reason Hiarcs did not do well may have that it operated on >slower hardware than the other top programs, though it is not clear to >me how much slower. >In any event, I do not think that the tournament result tells us very >much about what would be the outcome in a match on equal hardware between >the commercial versions of Shredder 3 and Hiarcs 7.32. >I guess I would bet on Hiarcs, but I wouldn't bet much. > >eric Yes, Hiarcs ran on just one processor... Shredder also ran on just one processor, and went without a loss. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.