Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:58:23 06/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 06:07:13, blass uri wrote: >I do not complain about the fact that shredder is first. >I only said that Junior deserves a better place(I did not say first place) This is always a problem with only few rounds. IMO Sonneborn-Berger at least gives some better look at detail. But it only helps for same points. >I have not enough data to be sure about nothing but I believe (based on the >results of the tournaments and the games that I saw) that shredder is better >than Deep Junior inspite of the hardware advantage of Deep Junior. That is what has to be proved now. >I believe based on my data(again I have not enough data to be sure about >nothing) that Junior made an improvement of more than 40 ssdf rating points(if >we do not include the hardware improvement) but it is probably not enough to be >better than shredder4. >Uri You mean Junior or Junior+hardware makes a plus of 40pts?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.