Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 05:18:02 06/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 07:38:26, Shep wrote:
>On June 21, 1999 at 05:24:04, blass uri wrote:
>
>>Here is the game(108/60 is of course not correct and the right time conrol is
>>270\40 and after it 108\20 when the sides lost the few minutes that they did not
>>use in the first 40 moves):
>>
>>
>>[Event "Level=108'/60+30'/20+24'. "]
>-snip-
>>{67108860kB. Pentium} 1. e4 {0} 1... e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O
>
>I suppose the hash table size is also not correct, or did you give your programs
>67 GB of hash, Uri? ;-))
>
>Interesting game; please keep posting your news about Junior, the new version
>looks very promising again.
>
>---
>Shep
Probably endgame play needs most improvement. In Paderborn I noticed, that
Deep Junior displays still 0.00 evaluation, when Shredder has +5,XX! Even, if
Junior seems to use tablebases in search.
Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.