Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 12:16:39 06/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 11:16:01, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >Having adapted the hash tables to the recommended level of each program, I have >continued and finished the intensive Hiarcs 7.32 test.(40 moves/2 hours). > >Hiarcs 7.32- Fritz 5.32 +5 -0 =3 6,5-1,5 > >Hiarcs 7.32- Junior 5 +8 -3 =4 10,0-5,0 > >Hiarcs 7.32- Crafty 16.6 +15 -3 =2 16,5-3,5 > >This very high performance of Hiarcs 7.32, together with other tests run by >other people here, makes me think that probably Hiarcs 7.32 will be closer to >2.650 than to 2.625, making very strange its poor performance in Padeborn. > >Tomas. > >..by the way, the results obtained by Hiarcs 7.32 after adapting the hash-tables >have been better than beforehand!. Very interesting! Thanks! ..by the way, what is the recommended level of hash tables for Hiarcs 7.32, as used in your test? Sune.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.