Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 16:49:36 06/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 11:16:01, Tomas Casanovas Martinez wrote: >Having adapted the hash tables to the recommended level of each program, I have >continued and finished the intensive Hiarcs 7.32 test.(40 moves/2 hours). > >Hiarcs 7.32- Fritz 5.32 +5 -0 =3 6,5-1,5 > >Hiarcs 7.32- Junior 5 +8 -3 =4 10,0-5,0 > >Hiarcs 7.32- Crafty 16.6 +15 -3 =2 16,5-3,5 > >This very high performance of Hiarcs 7.32, together with other tests run by >other people here, makes me think that probably Hiarcs 7.32 will be closer to >2.650 than to 2.625, making very strange its poor performance in Padeborn. > >Tomas. > >..by the way, the results obtained by Hiarcs 7.32 after adapting the hash-tables >have been better than beforehand!. It would be of some help if you would also post what opening books are used for each program; for example, you should't be using Hiarcs opening book for Fritz and vice versa. Also, there are two opening books for Fritz - general ctg, and F5 book ctg. The latter is especially suited to Fritz's playing style from what I've been able to ascertain. It would also be important to know what hash-table settings you used for Hiarcs and Fritz. Also relevant to hash-tables is the speed of your processor - which should also be noted here. The formula for hash-tables is the same for both Hiarcs and Fritz: 2 x processor speed x seconds per move = HT. Example: 40/2 on a 400MHz processor would require 144 megs for optimum use according to the manual, program, and other informed sources. Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.