Author: Tina Long
Date: 17:52:56 06/21/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 19:59:09, blass uri wrote: > >I do not agree that it had a poor performance in Padeborn. >It was playing against better programs than Fritz5.32,Junior5,crafty16.6. > >I think that most of the opponent of Hiarcs were clearly better than >Fritz5.32,Junior5 and Crafty16.6 > >It drew against Deep Junior(better than Junior5 in software and in hardware) >It drew against shredder4(a program that may have 2700 ssdf rating) >It lost against parralel Fritz(better than Fritz5.32) >It won parralel Ferret(better than the programs that you tested Hiarcs against >them). > >It lost against cilkchess that had a big hardware advantage. >It won chesstiger and Mchess8. > >Uri Was "it" the same Hiarcs 7 you or I can buy, or was "it" a newer developmental version, possibly better than Hiarcs 7. We know "it" was not Hiarcs 7.32 running a Fritz GUI Tina
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.