Author: blass uri
Date: 00:05:32 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
<snipped> >>I think that computers help humans to do tactical blunders. >>I think that sokolov was surprised by good moves of Fritz in the opening. >> >>I think that Fritz had advantage and a good chance to win even without the >>blunder of sokolov. > > > >Then I don't understand... as when DB ripped Kasparov in game 6, Kasparov >played poorly and the computer was lucky. Here the GM was OK and Fritz played >great? While still in book? The two circumstances seem similar. In _both_ >games the human blundered in the opening and lost quickly... In the game of kasparov the human blundered in a known position from theory. In this case I understand that Fritz played a novelty Bh6. In the game of kasparov computers evaluate the position after Nxe6 of deeper blue as better for black when in this case I found that the evaluation of computers show advantage for white. I think that the kind of position that Fritz came out of the opening is better for computers and probably Fritz could practically win another GM from the position after Bh6 I think that the practical mistake of the sokolov was that it chose a bad opening. Instead of playing Nxe4 going to open spanish it was better to play for close positions with Be7. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.