Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:17:12 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 20:52:56, Tina Long wrote: >>I do not agree that it had a poor performance in Padeborn. >>It was playing against better programs than Fritz5.32,Junior5,crafty16.6. >> >>I think that most of the opponent of Hiarcs were clearly better than >>Fritz5.32,Junior5 and Crafty16.6 >> >>It drew against Deep Junior(better than Junior5 in software and in hardware) >>It drew against shredder4(a program that may have 2700 ssdf rating) >>It lost against parralel Fritz(better than Fritz5.32) >>It won parralel Ferret(better than the programs that you tested Hiarcs against >>them). >> >>It lost against cilkchess that had a big hardware advantage. >>It won chesstiger and Mchess8. >> >>Uri > >Was "it" the same Hiarcs 7 you or I can buy, or was "it" a newer developmental >version, possibly better than Hiarcs 7. We know "it" was not Hiarcs 7.32 >running a Fritz GUI >Tina Maybe/probably it wass not Hiarcs7.32/commercial but it ran under the Fritz-GUI.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.