Author: Shep
Date: 03:25:35 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 03:46:52, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>I looked on your site, but could not find your settings you are using for CM6K. >>I assume the standards settings, but what size hash tables and what is selective >>search set on >> >>Thanks > >I would like to add I think using any other setting than the standards ones, >with SS=10 and 16 meg hash table settings would greatly reduce the strength of >CM6K. CM6555 settings have not been tested much. And Johann stated that the >above settings I said are the strongest for CM6K. > >So any modified setting eg; CM5555 is unfair in my opinion to be used for CM6K. > >I hope you followed Johann's settings and not other ones. You have things mixed up a bit. To clarify: CM 6000 is playing with its standard settings, except that selectivity is set to 10 instead of 6. CM 5555 (*not* CM 6555!) is a modified CM 5500 (*not* CM 6000) personality. It plays better than 5500 IMO. It has performed extraordinarily well in almost 100 games at 40/120 on my site, that's why I still use it, though CM 5500 is already quite old. Hash size is 64 MB for both CMs. I have not yet checked if 128 MB will help or harm, probably neither. --- Shep
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.