Author: Jay Scott
Date: 09:42:08 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 1999 at 16:49:47, Dave Gomboc wrote: >If it does not come up with "normal" variations, it indicates that the computer >assessment differs greatly from the human assessment. Given that the human >assessment is based on a ton of experience, if a clear tactical bust isn't >present, human experience is more likely to be correct than the machine >analysis. Human and computer players have different strengths. So it may be that the human analysis is superior for human use and the computer analysis is superior for computer use. Jay
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.