Author: Pete Galati
Date: 11:10:12 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 13:54:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 11:47:16, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On June 22, 1999 at 11:15:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 22, 1999 at 10:43:53, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On June 22, 1999 at 01:16:28, James Swafford wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On June 21, 1999 at 20:40:05, walter irvin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> my program is not ready yet in the one game it drew the mach iv it was winning >>>>>>but the search produced move that allowed counter play.i have to fix that >>>>>>problem to me thats unexceptable play . >>>>>> the reason its not an easy problem to fix is the search is totally different >>>>>>than conventional chess program .its based on pattern rec .i only know it would >>>>>>never play that type move again . but need further testing . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Now I'm intrigued. Pattern recognition? In such a short period >>>>>of time?? With results like that??? >>>>> >>>>>:-) >>>> >>>>I'm skeptical. But he's welcome to prove me wrong. >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>>I've been falling all over myself this morning... Can't seem to walk because >>>"something" keeps "pulling my leg"... >>> >>>:) >> >>Yeah, I didn't figure you had missed the mark so bad with Crafty, too bad you're >>going to have to start all over again! Amazing. You might want to hang on to >>your code for a while anyhow. >> >>Pete > > >This happens about once every 1-2 years... IE about 2 years ago on r.g.c.c >we had a 'new program' announced that was playing good chess. Many of us >asked for games. "nada". We kept insisting... Finally two games were posted. >Both matched _exactly_ the moves played by the current version of Crafty. No >more was heard from this 'breakthrough'... > >:) I gotta admit Bob, he makes up excuses better than I do, so he's got that going for him. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.