Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 11:38:04 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 14:28:03, Mark Young wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 13:34:01, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 22, 1999 at 12:08:49, Mark Young wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>30'/60+30'/60+0'0 1999 >>> >>> 1234567890 >>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 1½111½1110 8.0/10 >>>2 Fritz 5.00/16Bit 0½000½0001 2.0/10 >> >> >>Isn't this the _wrong_ version of fritz? IE fritz 5.32 seems (IMHO) to >>be much stronger than the 16 bit version. I have been playing games vs >>fritz 5.32 and Hiarcs 7 (both using an automatic interface) and so far, >>Fritz 5.32 feels 'stronger' to me... This was funny to read, coming from Bob. :) >Fritz 5.32 will be tested vs Hiarcs7.32. I setup my testing computer with more >memory and a new harddrive so I could fully test Hiarcs7.32 with tablebase etc. >Loaded the Chessbase programs...when I tried to load Fritz 5.32 it would not >read. :( I will have to buy another copy. Did you ask the manufacturer to exchange the disk for you? (Aside: someone commented a few months back about CD copying... here's a good example of why I backup my CDs!) >In my other chessbase rating games in chessbase Fritz 5.00 was the top rated >program, with Fritz 5.32 a close second. I too feel Fritz 5.32 is stronger but >not by much. > >Do I think Hiarcs 7.32 is as good as this first match results would suggest. >Hell no. I am playing Junior 5.0 vs Hiarcs 7.32 now as I write this. After one >game played it is down 0-1, but in the second game now being played it just now >showed a mate in 18. So after 2 games with Junior 5 it is 1-1. > >P.S. I just got a CD-rom burner and installed it in one of my computers last >night, a Yahmaha 4x4x16 to backup my cd's. Good idea. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.