Author: walter irvin
Date: 12:49:11 06/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 13:54:19, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 22, 1999 at 11:47:16, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On June 22, 1999 at 11:15:24, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 22, 1999 at 10:43:53, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On June 22, 1999 at 01:16:28, James Swafford wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>On June 21, 1999 at 20:40:05, walter irvin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> my program is not ready yet in the one game it drew the mach iv it was winning >>>>>>but the search produced move that allowed counter play.i have to fix that >>>>>>problem to me thats unexceptable play . >>>>>> the reason its not an easy problem to fix is the search is totally different >>>>>>than conventional chess program .its based on pattern rec .i only know it would >>>>>>never play that type move again . but need further testing . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Now I'm intrigued. Pattern recognition? In such a short period >>>>>of time?? With results like that??? >>>>> >>>>>:-) >>>> >>>>I'm skeptical. But he's welcome to prove me wrong. >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>>I've been falling all over myself this morning... Can't seem to walk because >>>"something" keeps "pulling my leg"... >>> >>>:) >> >>Yeah, I didn't figure you had missed the mark so bad with Crafty, too bad you're >>going to have to start all over again! Amazing. You might want to hang on to >>your code for a while anyhow. >> >>Pete > > >This happens about once every 1-2 years... IE about 2 years ago on r.g.c.c >we had a 'new program' announced that was playing good chess. Many of us >asked for games. "nada". We kept insisting... Finally two games were posted. >Both matched _exactly_ the moves played by the current version of Crafty. No >more was heard from this 'breakthrough'... > >:) beating up on the mach IV is not much of a break through , also this program has nothing much to do with crafty, crafty is good , right now more sound than mine , but look at the amount of time that has been spent on crafty .crafty on my mII 300 mhz bench mark 85,000 nps, mine does not even search this way ,my 2 main factors are hard drive space 20 gig, pattern rec .i want to make sure i win so further refinements are in order . i think my concept is a break through but i'm not there ,getting closer .to me there would be scores like 22/1 against rebel ect without these bad moves showing up ever so often. people should be glad there are people like me who will try new way of doing things maybe i have success maybe not ,time will tell. i know right now the program plays too unstable sometimes gm move sometimes 900 move although i have weeded out alot of problems .plus no gui yet . if all i was going to do was write another program that searched the way crafty,fritz,rebel ect. i would not do it they are doing the best that can be done with that method . this method so far some great and not so great results , but this way is different unrefined so far , but im not going to give up because people say it is impossible .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.