Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 05:44:44 06/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 1999 at 03:05:32, blass uri wrote: ><snipped> >>>I think that computers help humans to do tactical blunders. >>>I think that sokolov was surprised by good moves of Fritz in the opening. >>> >>>I think that Fritz had advantage and a good chance to win even without the >>>blunder of sokolov. >> >> >> >>Then I don't understand... as when DB ripped Kasparov in game 6, Kasparov >>played poorly and the computer was lucky. Here the GM was OK and Fritz played >>great? While still in book? The two circumstances seem similar. In _both_ >>games the human blundered in the opening and lost quickly... > >In the game of kasparov the human blundered in a known position from theory. >In this case I understand that Fritz played a novelty Bh6. > >In the game of kasparov computers evaluate the position after Nxe6 of deeper >blue as better for black when in this case I found that the evaluation of >computers show advantage for white. > >I think that the kind of position that Fritz came out of the opening is better >for computers and probably Fritz could practically win another GM from the >position after Bh6 > >I think that the practical mistake of the sokolov was that it chose a bad >opening. >Instead of playing Nxe4 going to open spanish it was better to play for close >positions with Be7. > >Uri According to GM Einar Gausel, its a popular move against computers as its usually leads to endgame positions quite early, after a lot of excahnges in the opening. Torstein Hall
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.