Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:47:21 06/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1999 at 05:23:21, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 24, 1999 at 05:09:40, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On June 24, 1999 at 04:11:14, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On June 24, 1999 at 03:31:41, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>If you win an IM clearly, then you are certainly ABOVE. Right? And what is above >>>>IM? Is there something between IM and GM? I don't know of anything. >>>>I was not talking of EARNING a NORM. >>>>I was talking of GM LEVEL. >>>> >>>>>And hiarcs did >>>>>win... but aren't we discussing 40/2hr time controls here? The hiarcs/Hergott >>>>>match was not 40/2. So it all seems totally unrelated to the question being >>>>>asked... >>>> >>>>What was the time control then? AFAIR it was 40/120 or VERY VERY CLOSE. >>> >>>Don't forget other matches. Mchess 6 has won GM Nesis(?) 3,5 - 2,5 under >>>tournament conditions!!! This is more DATA for Bob. >>> >>>Jouni >> >>Both of you guys are picking and choosing events. This is precisely what Bob is >>trying to avoid by sticking with a current timeframe where all of the results >>are remembered, whether pro- or contra- to the assertion that programs are of GM >>strength. >> >>Dave > >Picking events? Yes. The only events that took place. For NOT PICKING let us >please start a collection of games between humans and computers under tournament >or close to tournament time control, started 1995 e.g. That is the 'problem'. I think you listed almost _all_ of the GM vs computer games (at 40/2hr) above. :) (ie there are practically none).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.