Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 07:23:28 06/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1999 at 04:19:15, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On June 23, 1999 at 21:48:00, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>On June 23, 1999 at 14:49:54, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>if a program only evaluates draw over draw-score, and loses (like fritz in paris >>>against ferret e.g.) what is the realistic part of the score ?? >>>Ferret was 0.43 up and fritz was 0.00 ! What was realistic of this evaluation? >>>What was fritz evaluating ? Its chances to win the championship? >> >>Ferret didn't play Fritz in Paris, except in the blitz, and its eval window was >>closed during that game. So perhaps you mean Paderborn? >> >>bruce > >Yeah ! Ferret was playing Fritz in Paderborn. And was 0.43 up. >And later it was 1.30 up etc. >and fritz' evaluation was horrible. >But in Paris Fritz had similar draw-scores. >This was my point. Because i have these strange scores at home too. Ferret has a huge speculative penalty for having the king and the rook screwed up like that. The reason is that I got sick of losing games where its king and rook got srewed up like that. The score bottomed out at +0.29 or something, right after c3. Everyone was saying my program was dead, for quite a long time, and perhaps they were right. I enjoyed that game but I've been on the receiving end of that kind of thing, too, from approximately everyone. bruce
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.