Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:00:01 06/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 1999 at 09:47:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>If you win an IM clearly, then you are certainly ABOVE. Right? And what is above >>>>>IM? Is there something between IM and GM? I don't know of anything. >>>>>I was not talking of EARNING a NORM. >>>>>I was talking of GM LEVEL. >>>>> >>>>>>And hiarcs did >>>>>>win... but aren't we discussing 40/2hr time controls here? The hiarcs/Hergott >>>>>>match was not 40/2. So it all seems totally unrelated to the question being >>>>>>asked... >>>>> >>>>>What was the time control then? AFAIR it was 40/120 or VERY VERY CLOSE. >>>> >>>>Don't forget other matches. Mchess 6 has won GM Nesis(?) 3,5 - 2,5 under >>>>tournament conditions!!! This is more DATA for Bob. >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>Both of you guys are picking and choosing events. This is precisely what Bob is >>>trying to avoid by sticking with a current timeframe where all of the results >>>are remembered, whether pro- or contra- to the assertion that programs are of GM >>>strength. >>> >>>Dave >> >>Picking events? Yes. The only events that took place. For NOT PICKING let us >>please start a collection of games between humans and computers under tournament >>or close to tournament time control, started 1995 e.g. > > >That is the 'problem'. I think you listed almost _all_ of the GM vs computer >games (at 40/2hr) above. :) (ie there are practically none). I don't know but if it is so you can't say I'd only pick the wins if there are ONLY wins. :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.